<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ada Lovelace Day: Mary Shelley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/</link>
	<description>Professional site of Amanda L. French, Ph.D. -- digital humanities teaching, training, research, writing, unconference organizing, and web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine Markides</title>
		<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine Markides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandafrench.net/?p=291#comment-514</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not only 19th century handwriting that&#039;s bad. Have you ever seen Joyce&#039;s drafts for Ulysses or Finnegan&#039;s Wake (although in all fairness, Wake isn&#039;t much more legible in printed form)? As for the 21st century, we don&#039;t know if handwriting is any better or worse than its 19th century counterpart since we don&#039;t have any samples.

Great piece. I see you are about as frequent in posting as I am on my website. That&#039;s what happens when you start tweeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not only 19th century handwriting that&#8217;s bad. Have you ever seen Joyce&#8217;s drafts for Ulysses or Finnegan&#8217;s Wake (although in all fairness, Wake isn&#8217;t much more legible in printed form)? As for the 21st century, we don&#8217;t know if handwriting is any better or worse than its 19th century counterpart since we don&#8217;t have any samples.</p>
<p>Great piece. I see you are about as frequent in posting as I am on my website. That&#8217;s what happens when you start tweeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Reader &#124; William Patrick Wend</title>
		<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Reader &#124; William Patrick Wend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandafrench.net/?p=291#comment-500</guid>
		<description>[...] Amanda French&#8217;s creative use of Ada Lovelace Day to discuss Mary Shelley.  I really like her argument that Shelley was the first science fiction novelist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amanda French&#8217;s creative use of Ada Lovelace Day to discuss Mary Shelley.  I really like her argument that Shelley was the first science fiction novelist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda French</title>
		<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandafrench.net/?p=291#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Hee hee, arvind! Thing is, nothing I wrote is really about Mary Shelley per se. I really meant that I couldn&#039;t add anything to the biography, doncha know. But I&#039;m glad you smiled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hee hee, arvind! Thing is, nothing I wrote is really about Mary Shelley per se. I really meant that I couldn&#8217;t add anything to the biography, doncha know. But I&#8217;m glad you smiled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arvind</title>
		<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>arvind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandafrench.net/?p=291#comment-491</guid>
		<description>What a delightfully digressive rumination! I started smiling at the disclaimer about not adding much beyond what&#039;s on the wikipedia page, and the smile persisted for the rest of the post. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a delightfully digressive rumination! I started smiling at the disclaimer about not adding much beyond what&#8217;s on the wikipedia page, and the smile persisted for the rest of the post. <img src='http://amandafrench.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa White</title>
		<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandafrench.net/?p=291#comment-490</guid>
		<description>It is crap, and I wish we could all just laugh such quacks off instead of actually having to take the time to disprove them.

What I should have said before:  thanks for a great, smart post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is crap, and I wish we could all just laugh such quacks off instead of actually having to take the time to disprove them.</p>
<p>What I should have said before:  thanks for a great, smart post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda French</title>
		<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandafrench.net/?p=291#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Sure, I&#039;ll comment. Sounds like crap to me. :)

Mary herself, of course, wrote that Percy chivvied her to write more than she would have otherwise -- she had planned a short story, but at his urging wrote a whole novel. I&#039;m sure they talked it over and I&#039;m sure he suggested things, maybe even sentences or structure or whole pages. Mary said that he wrote the Preface, so there&#039;s that. 

But in the common sense of the word &quot;author,&quot; and not counting postmodern arguments that authorship is a collaborative spectrum instead of an individual accomplishment, Mary is the author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, I&#8217;ll comment. Sounds like crap to me. <img src='http://amandafrench.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mary herself, of course, wrote that Percy chivvied her to write more than she would have otherwise &#8212; she had planned a short story, but at his urging wrote a whole novel. I&#8217;m sure they talked it over and I&#8217;m sure he suggested things, maybe even sentences or structure or whole pages. Mary said that he wrote the Preface, so there&#8217;s that. </p>
<p>But in the common sense of the word &#8220;author,&#8221; and not counting postmodern arguments that authorship is a collaborative spectrum instead of an individual accomplishment, Mary is the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa White</title>
		<link>http://amandafrench.net/2009/03/24/ada-lovelace-day-mary-shelley/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amandafrench.net/?p=291#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Creative take on the assignment, Ms. French!  Would you care to comment on the NASSR-L contention that P.B. Shelley HAD to be the author of _F_?  Great example of an argument that is all warrant, but despite its puniness generated plenty of discursive heat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creative take on the assignment, Ms. French!  Would you care to comment on the NASSR-L contention that P.B. Shelley HAD to be the author of _F_?  Great example of an argument that is all warrant, but despite its puniness generated plenty of discursive heat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
